How to pitch a brand

The treatment that wins isn't the cheapest or the prettiest. It's the one that proves you understood the brief. Here's the structure, section by section.

Adam Murray6 August 202611 min read
On this page

Most pitches lose in the first thirty seconds, and not on price.

They lose because they open with the creator (who they are, what they shoot, what gear they own) and the person reading has a specific problem they need solved this quarter. By paragraph three they still don't know whether you understood it.

A pitch that wins does one thing above all others: it proves you read the brief and thought about it. Everything else is supporting material.

What the person reading is actually doing

Understand the room. Someone at the brand has three to fifteen of these open. They are not comparing you against an ideal. They're sorting into "no", "maybe", and "call this one".

They're trying to answer three questions, in this order:

  1. Did they understand what we're trying to do?
  2. Do I believe they can execute this specific thing?
  3. Is this deliverable, on time, at a number we can defend internally?

Notice that price is third, and that it's framed as defensible, not low. A quote someone can justify to their boss beats a cheaper one they can't.

Notice also that question one is about the brief, not about you. Most pitches never answer it at all.

The structure

Seven sections. In this order, because the order encodes the priorities above.

1 · Restate the problem, in your words

One paragraph. Not the brief pasted back. The brief understood, with something added.

"You need the new range to feel like it belongs to the same world as the flagship line, but the flagship films are studio-lit and the new range is priced for a different customer. The film has to carry the family resemblance without looking like it cost the same to make."

That paragraph does more work than a showreel. It says: I read it, I understood the tension, and I've already been thinking about the hard part.

If you can't write this paragraph, you don't understand the brief well enough to pitch. Go and ask a question instead: a good question at this stage is itself a strong signal.

2 · The approach

The core creative idea, in three or four sentences. What the film is.

Be specific enough to be wrong. "Cinematic and authentic" commits to nothing and could be pasted into any pitch ever written, which is exactly how it reads. "Shot entirely handheld in the workshop, no studio, one continuous take per product" is a decision. It might be the wrong decision, and the client will tell you, and that's a conversation. Vagueness doesn't get you a conversation.

Brands are choosing between approaches far more often than they're choosing between price points.

3 · How it looks

References, with a sentence each saying what you're pointing at.

This is the single most common place pitches go wrong. Six unlabelled frames is a mood; the client has to guess which part you meant, and they will guess wrong. One line fixes it:

"This one for the grade: the way the shadows stay warm. Not the camera movement."

A moodboard with annotations is a plan. Without them it's a Pinterest board.

4 · How it gets made

The practical section, and the one that separates professionals from enthusiasts.

  • Number of shoot days and roughly what happens on each
  • Crew: who's needed and why
  • Locations, or what you'd need from them
  • Key equipment, only where it's a creative decision rather than a spec list
  • What you need from the brand: access, product, a person, sign-off at defined points

That last bullet is disproportionately persuasive. It shows you've run projects before and know they fail on the client's side as often as yours.

5 · Timeline

Real dates, with the review rounds marked.

Brief lock → shoot → rough cut → round one → round two → picture lock → delivery.

Naming a fixed number of review rounds is protection for both sides, and clients read it as confidence rather than as a restriction. Two is a normal number. Unlimited is not a generous offer, it's an unpriced risk.

6 · Investment

Itemised. Production and usage as separate lines. See how to price a brand video for how to build both.

Itemised beats a single figure for one reason: it converts "can you do it cheaper?" into "which of these could we drop?". The first question you can only lose. The second is a scope conversation, and scope conversations are where good projects get shaped.

7 · Why you

Last. Three to five pieces of relevant work (relevant being the operative word). Two genuinely comparable projects beat eight impressive unrelated ones, because the client is trying to reduce their risk on this job.

Add any proof that isn't self-reported. A rating from a brand that actually booked and paid you is a different category of evidence from a testimonial you chose to include, for reasons covered in measured vs reported.

What loses

Opening with yourself. "I'm a Cape Town–based filmmaker with eight years of experience." Nobody's problem is solved by that sentence. Move it to section seven.

Gear lists as personality. The camera matters to you and to almost nobody on the other side. Mention equipment only where it's a creative choice: anamorphic because of what it does to the light, not because it's expensive.

Price with no structure. A bare number invites a bare counter-number.

Sending the same document twice. Reusing a template is fine and sensible. Reusing section one is fatal, and it's obvious immediately.

Over-length. Two to four pages. A twelve-page treatment for a 60-second social film signals that you don't know what this job is worth in effort.

Following up

Send once, wait, follow up once.

A single message about a week later: short, no pressure, ideally carrying something new rather than just "checking in". A thought you had about the approach. A reference you found afterwards. That gives the follow-up a reason to exist and gives them an easy way to re-engage.

Then leave it. Briefs get delayed, budgets get pulled, and a third chase converts a "not now" into a "not you".

Where Acumin fits

Pitch Studio builds this document: the structure above, laid out as a designed treatment with a shareable link, so the brand reads a page rather than downloading a PDF. Pitches sent through it record whether they were opened and what the response was, which over time tells you which of your sections are actually landing.

The AI assistant in Pitch Studio helps draft against the brief you're responding to. It drafts; you decide what's true. It has no idea what you can actually shoot next month.

None of this is required to pitch well. A well-structured document in any tool beats a beautiful one that opens with your bio.

How to use this tomorrow

Take the last pitch you sent and check one thing: how far down the page is the first sentence that's about their problem rather than about you?

If it's below the fold, that's why it went quiet.


Related: How to price a brand video builds the number that goes in section six. How to write a creative brief shows you what a good brief looks like from the inside (useful for spotting the gaps in the ones you receive).

Free document

Pitch treatment template

The treatment structure that leads with approach instead of price, in a document you can fill in for the next brief you see.

The method is all in this article and always will be; the download just saves you building it.

Send me the pitch treatment template

Written by
Adam Murray
Founder, Acumin

Adam builds Acumin. He spends his days on the same two problems this library is about: working out what a piece of content is actually worth, and getting a brief through production without it turning into something else.

Want this done on your own channel?

Acumin reads your public content and your category and hands back what to make next. Every call comes with its confidence and the evidence it rests on. The first Snapshot is free.